Press "Enter" to skip to content

What is the law on revenge porn? Ask the lawyer

Q: I recently broke things off with a boyfriend. He then posted three sexually explicit images of me online without my consent. It is humiliating, among other things, and I want to know how the law treats this kind of sickening behavior.

Confidential, Irvine

Ron Sokol

A: Revenge porn is the intentional distribution of one or more explicit or sexual images or videos without the consent of the person shown, when doing so causes the person to suffer serious emotional distress. Another way of describing it would be “non consensual pornography.” It is a crime under California Penal Code Section 647(j)(4), but civil remedies and damages also can be pursued. A criminal conviction  for revenge porn is punishable by up to six months in jail and a fine of up to $1,000. In a civil case, you can seek a restraining order and injunction against the other party, and monetary damages for the harm caused.

Q: A friend — or rather, a “former friend” — posted a photo of me online as a prank.  The photo shows me nude in a suggestive pose. He has since deleted the post and apologized, but isn’t what he did illegal? Do I just let it go?

S.C., Long Beach

A: Revenge porn requires intent; this means the person knowingly placed the photograph or image online, and knew or should have known doing so would cause the subject to suffer serious emotional distress.

You indicate the former friend claims, “It was just for fun — a prank!”  Arguably, that might provide a defense, but how credible is his assertion? In effect, he insists he did it just to “spoof” you, not to cause you alarm or distress. Given the description of the photo, could someone really be that reckless and/or shortsighted to think posting it was harmless?

While I am glad you say the post was deleted, and that he has apologized, one option is that you sit down with the police and make a report, if not also consult with qualified counsel. Isn’t there a likelihood someone else saved the image, or perhaps sent it to others? Will it surface again? Did he return the image to you and promise he will never publish it again in the future? In sum: Take steps to protect yourself.

Ron Sokol has been a practicing attorney for over 35 years, and has also served many times as a judge pro tem, mediator, and arbitrator.  It is important to keep in mind that this column presents a summary of the law, and is not to be treated or considered legal advice, let alone a substitute for actual consultation with a qualified professional.

Sign up for The Localist, our daily email newsletter with handpicked stories relevant to where you live. Subscribe here.


Source: Orange County Register

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *